Woman Sues Doctor for Wrongful Birth Due to Incorrect Filshie Clip Application

The plaintiff brought proceedings against the defendant, Dr Nita Dhupar, an obstetrician and gynaecologist, claiming damages as a result of alleged professional negligence in relation to a failed tubal ligation (Filshie clip) surgery, performed in August of 2014. The aim of this surgery is to achieve permanent occlusion of the fallopian tubes in which prevents future pregnancy. However, within twelve months of the elected surgery, the plaintiff unexpectedly conceived her fourth child. The damages claimed by the plaintiff are avoidable harm from conception, pregnancy, and childbirth.

In a detailed judgment, the court found in favour of the plaintiff, with the award of damages sitting at a total of $408,700. The court found that due to the failure of applying the Filshie clip correctly, fertilisation was possible. In addition, the court accepted expert evidence, which found Dr Dhupar to have acted outside the excepted standard of care for professional, as per s 5O of the Civil Liability Act. At 919:

Dr Dhupar’s failure to properly apply the Filshie clip to the left fallopian tube was contrary to peer professional opinion widely accepted in Australia as competent professional practice as identified and cited in the manufacturer’s literature and the RANZCOG guidelines.

An inherent risk defence was raised by the defendant as per s 5I of the CLA, however this was not accepted by the court, explaining that an inherent risk defence had to be disregarded due to the poor application of the clip itself. At 889:

‘Dr Dhupar’s non-typical application of the left Filshie clip had the effect of materially increasing the risk of permitting patency or partial patency of the fallopian tube to remain so as to allow the passage of gametes. An unintended pregnancy in those circumstances cannot be reasonably described as the materialisation of an inherent risk within the meaning of s 5I of the CL Act.’

The decision of Lee (a pseudonym) v Dhupar [2020] NSWDC 717 can be read in full here: https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decision/175ddc1cf4a985ef1722519a

Scott Eveleigh

McAuley Hawach Lawyers

11 Fennell Street, Parramatta NSW 2124

Telephone: (02) 9633 1826

Facsimile: (02) 9687 8114 (02) 9687 8114

Web: www.mcauleyhawach.com.au

Email: reception@mcauleyhawach.com.au

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on google
Share on email
Latest Insights

How to Bring a Personal Injury Claim

There are many types of personal injury claims. At times they involve the Courts and at other times they require a prompt response to process